Menu

Edexcel GCSE Computer Science (1CP2) Exam Questions

Build a practice paper from 604 exam-style questions, each with its mark scheme and example answers. Print it, or answer it on paper and then open the mark schemes. Or browse the questions by topic.

Build a paper

Topics (none ticked: all of them)
Question types (none ticked: all of them)

Practice paper

10 questions · 29 marks

Pick again
Print
1Multiple choice1 markE-waste Swap Remove

A business has replaced its old desktop computers and will throw them away.

Identify the term for discarded digital devices that have reached the end of their useful life.

[1 mark]
  • ACarbon footprint
  • BEnergy consumption
  • CE-waste
  • DReplacement cycle
Mark scheme
  • C E-waste (1)
  • The only correct answer is C. The correct answer is e-waste.
  • A is not correct because a carbon footprint is the total greenhouse gases produced by an activity
  • B is not correct because energy consumption is the amount of energy used
  • D is not correct because a replacement cycle is the time between buying a device and buying its replacement
Example answers and how they were marked
Full marks1/1

C E-waste

Why: Correct option: e-waste is the term for discarded digital devices.

No marks0/1

A Carbon footprint

Why: A related environmental term, but not the term for discarded devices.

No marks0/1

D Replacement cycle

Why: This concerns buying devices, not the devices thrown away at disposal.

2Multiple choice1 markManufacturing Technology Swap Remove
[1 mark]
  • Afactory manufactures digital devices. Identify one way that this manufacturing harms the environment. A Devices are buried in landfill
  • BDevices are left on standby
  • CDevices are replaced too often
  • DFossil fuels are burned to power factories
Mark scheme
  • D Fossil fuels are burned to power factories (1)
  • The only correct answer is D. The correct answer is fossil fuels are burned to power factories.
  • A is not correct because burying devices in landfill is an issue with disposal
  • B is not correct because leaving devices on standby is an issue with energy consumption during use
  • C is not correct because replacing devices too often is an issue with the replacement cycle
Example answers and how they were marked
Full marks1/1

D Fossil fuels are burned to power factories

Why: Correct: burning fossil fuels to power factories is an environmental issue of manufacture (1).

No marks0/1

A Devices are buried in landfill

Why: Near miss but no mark: landfill is an issue with disposal, not with manufacture.

No marks0/1

C Devices are replaced too often

Why: No mark: this is about the replacement cycle, not about the manufacturing process.

3Multiple choice1 markManufacturing Technology Swap Remove

A business is reviewing how much energy its computers use and how often it replaces them.

Identify one way the business can reduce the energy consumption of its computers.

[1 mark]
  • ATurn off power saving mode
  • BLeave computers switched on overnight so updates can install
  • CReplace computers every year
  • DSet computers to standby when unused
Mark scheme
  • D Set computers to standby when unused (1)
  • The only correct answer is D. The correct answer is set computers to standby when unused.
  • A is not correct because turning off power saving mode lets a computer use more energy when it is not being used
  • B is not correct because a computer left switched on overnight still uses energy while it installs updates
  • C is not correct because replacing computers every year shortens the replacement cycle, so more energy is used to manufacture the new devices
Example answers and how they were marked
Full marks1/1

D Set computers to standby when unused

Why: Correct option: standby reduces the energy a computer uses when it is not in use (1).

No marks0/1

A Turn off power saving mode

Why: Near miss but no mark: turning off power saving mode lets the computer use more energy when it is not being used.

No marks0/1

C Replace computers every year

Why: No mark: frequent replacement shortens the replacement cycle and uses more energy in manufacturing, rather than reducing energy consumption.

4Short recall2 marksManufacturing Technology Swap Remove

Digital devices are replaced regularly, which can affect the environment.

Define the term 'replacement cycle'.

[2 marks]
Mark scheme

Award one mark for any of the following up to a maximum of two marks:

  • The time/length of time between buying/purchasing a device (1)
  • The buying/purchasing of its replacement (1)
  • The point at which a device is replaced (1)
  • How often a device is replaced (1)
  • The time/length of time before a replacement device is bought/purchased (1)

Allow 'the period of use before a device is replaced' for both marks.

Allow 'the time between buying a new device' for one mark only: it gives the start of the cycle but does not state that the next device is a replacement.

Do not accept the time a device lasts / the lifetime of a device / the time until a device breaks or stops working on its own, as this does not refer to replacement.

Example answers and how they were marked
Full marks2/2

The time between buying a device and buying its replacement.

Why: Gives the start point, the time between buying a device (1), and the buying of its replacement (1).

Some marks1/2

The time between buying a new device.

Why: Gives the start of the cycle (1); it does not state that the next device is a replacement, so no second mark.

No marks0/2

The time a device lasts before it breaks.

Why: Describes the lifetime/time until failure of a device, not the replacement cycle, so no marks.

5Describe2 marksManufacturing Technology Swap Remove

Many digital devices are replaced after only a few years, even if they still work.

Describe one reason why the replacement cycle for digital devices is often short.

[2 marks]
Mark scheme

Award up to two marks for a linked description such as:

  • New software requires more memory/processing power (1) so an older device cannot run it well/becomes slow (1)
  • Manufacturers use planned obsolescence (1) so devices are designed to stop working after a set time (1)
  • New models are released/advertised often (1) so users upgrade to get the new features (1)
  • Parts such as batteries wear out (1) so the device stops working/needs to be replaced (1)

Allow a description of devices being designed to fail after a set time, without the term planned obsolescence, for the first point (1).

Do not award a second mark for stating only that a part such as the battery wears out/stops holding charge, with no linked development.

Do not award credit for 'users want a new/nicer device' or 'devices are fashionable' on its own, with no linked development.

Do not accept 'software is updated' on its own, without saying that an older device cannot run it/becomes slow.

Do not accept responses about the environmental impact of replacing devices, such as more e-waste or more manufacturing.

Example answers and how they were marked
Full marks2/2

New software needs more memory and processing power, so older devices become too slow to run it.

Why: New software needs more resources point (1) linked to older devices becoming slow/unable to run it (1).

Some marks1/2

The battery stops holding charge.

Why: Parts such as batteries wearing out point (1) but no linked development about the device stopping working/needing to be replaced, which the guidance says is needed for the second mark.

No marks0/2

It creates more e-waste, which goes to landfill.

Why: This gives an environmental impact of replacing devices, which the mark scheme says is not accepted, not a reason why the replacement cycle is short.

6Explain2 marksE-waste Swap Remove

Old digital devices are thrown away as e-waste, but they contain metals such as gold and copper.

Explain one environmental benefit of recycling the metals from old digital devices.

[2 marks]
Mark scheme

Award up to two marks for a linked explanation such as:

  • Fewer raw materials need to be mined/extracted (1) because the recycled metals can be used to make new devices (1)
  • Non-renewable resources/metal ores are conserved (1) because recycling means they are not used up as quickly (1)
  • Less energy is used (1) because getting metal from ore uses more energy than recycling it (1)
  • Less damage is caused to the land (1) because mining causes erosion/contamination of the ground (1)
  • Less e-waste is sent to landfill (1) because recycling recovers the metals so the devices are not thrown away (1)

For both marks, the expansion must follow/associate with the statement.

A valid point followed by an economic (cost) reason rather than an environmental one can still earn the point mark (1) but not the second mark.

For the raw materials point, the raw materials must be linked to the recycled metals being reused to make new devices.

Do not accept 'saves resources' on its own without saying which resources are saved or how they are saved.

Do not accept 'less energy' on its own without saying that getting metal from ore uses more energy than recycling.

Do not accept 'it is better for the environment' / 'recycling helps the environment' without the environmental benefit being stated.

Do not accept answers about saving money/cost as the second mark, as these are economic benefits, not environmental ones.

Example answers and how they were marked
Full marks2/2

Fewer metal ores need to be mined because the recycled metals can be used to make new devices instead.

Why: Linked point (1) that fewer raw materials are mined and reason (1) that the recycled metal is reused.

Some marks1/2

We do not need to mine as much metal, which saves the company money.

Why: Valid point credited for less mining (1), but the expansion is an economic benefit, so the linked reason is not awarded.

No marks0/2

Recycling is better for the environment than throwing devices away.

Why: Rewords the question with no environmental benefit stated and no reason.

7Explain2 marksManufacturing Technology Swap Remove

A smartphone has a battery that cannot be removed or replaced.

Explain one way this can affect the environment.

[2 marks]
Mark scheme

Award up to two marks for a linked explanation such as:

  • The whole phone has to be replaced when the battery stops working (1) so more raw materials are mined/extracted to manufacture the new phones (1)
  • The whole phone has to be replaced when the battery stops working (1) so more energy/water is used to manufacture new phones (1)
  • The whole phone is thrown away when the battery stops working (1) so more e-waste goes to landfill (1)
  • The phone has a shorter replacement cycle (1) so more devices are manufactured, which uses more energy and raw materials (1)

For both marks, the expansion must follow/associate with the statement.

A statement on its own, such as 'the phone has to be replaced sooner' or 'there will be more e-waste', earns (1) as the point; the second mark is for the linked environmental effect.

Do not accept 'the battery cannot be replaced' on its own, as this repeats the stem.

Do not accept 'the phone is bad for the environment' without saying how the environment is affected.

Do not accept answers about the phone using more electricity while it is being used; the issue is the replacement of the whole phone.

Example answers and how they were marked
Full marks2/2

When the battery stops working the whole phone has to be replaced, so more raw materials have to be mined to make the new phones.

Why: Linked point (1) and reason (1): replacement of the whole phone, expanded with the environmental effect of manufacturing a new phone.

Some marks1/2

The phone will need to be replaced sooner.

Why: Point (1) for the shorter replacement cycle; no linked environmental effect is given, so the second mark is not awarded.

No marks0/2

The battery cannot be replaced, so the phone uses more electricity.

Why: Repeats the stem and gives an effect during use, which the mark scheme does not accept; no creditworthy point about replacement.

8Discuss6 marksE-waste Swap Remove

A council is running a campaign about e-waste. Many residents put old phones, tablets and batteries in their general rubbish bin. The council wants residents to understand why this is harmful.

Discuss the environmental issues caused when digital devices are not disposed of correctly.

Your answer should consider:

  • the materials that digital devices contain
  • what can happen to e-waste in landfill
  • the effect on people and the environment
[6 marks]
Mark scheme

Indicative content

Materials

  • Digital devices contain small amounts of valuable metals such as gold, copper and aluminium, which are non-renewable and are wasted if the device is buried in the bin.
  • Devices contain plastics made from oil, which do not break down when they are buried.
  • Devices contain hazardous substances, for example lead and mercury on circuit boards and lithium in batteries.

Landfill

  • Burying devices means their materials cannot be recovered, so more raw materials have to be mined, which uses energy and damages habitats.
  • Chemicals from the devices can leak into the soil and groundwater, contaminating water supplies and harming wildlife.
  • Landfill sites fill up with devices that could have been repaired or recycled, using land that could be used for something else.
  • Old batteries in landfill can catch fire and release harmful gases.

Effect on people and the environment

  • When e-waste is burned to recover metals, toxic gases and smoke are released, polluting the air and causing breathing problems for people nearby.
  • Dumped e-waste damages habitats, and the chemicals can enter the food chain.
  • People who dismantle e-waste by hand can be exposed to harmful substances.
  • Disposing of devices incorrectly wastes all the energy and materials that were used to make them.

Levels

  • Level 0 (0 marks): No rewardable content.
  • Level 1 (1–2 marks): Basic, independent points are made, showing elements of understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion will contain basic information with little linkage between points made or application to the context. (AO2)
  • Level 2 (3–4 marks): Demonstrates adequate understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion shows some linkages and lines of reasoning with some structure and application to the context. (AO2)
  • Level 3 (5–6 marks): Demonstrates comprehensive understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science to support the discussion being presented. (AO1) The discussion is well developed, with sustained lines of reasoning that are coherent and logically structured, and which clearly apply to the context. (AO2)

Level 3 responses must cover both the materials the devices contain and the effect of disposing of them incorrectly.

Example answers and how they were marked
Full marks6/6

Residents should not put old phones in the bin because of the materials they contain. A phone contains metals such as gold, copper and aluminium, which are non-renewable, so burying the phone wastes them and more has to be mined. It also contains hazardous substances, such as lead and mercury on the circuit board and lithium in the battery. In landfill, these chemicals can leak into the soil and into the water supply, which harms wildlife and people. If e-waste is burned, for example to get the copper out of cables, toxic gases are released into the air and people living nearby can get breathing problems. The devices should be taken to a recycling centre instead, so the metals are recovered and the hazardous parts are removed safely.

Why: Level 3: covers non-renewable and hazardous materials, leakage in landfill and harm from burning, all applied to residents' phones and to the council's campaign.

Some marks3/6

E-waste contains metals like gold and copper that could be used again. If it goes to landfill these metals are wasted. The chemicals in the phone can also leak into the ground and pollute it.

Why: Level 2: two linked points are made, but there is nothing about e-waste being burned or about the effect on people, and little application to the residents.

Some marks1/6

E-waste causes pollution when it is thrown away. Devices are made of plastic, which is a renewable material, so it will break down in the ground.

Why: Level 1: a basic point about pollution is made, but the statement that plastic is renewable and breaks down is a misconception and gains no credit.

9Discuss6 marksManufacturing Technology Swap Remove

A company manufactures laptop computers.

Each laptop contains a processor, a screen and a battery.

Making one laptop uses many different materials.

Discuss the environmental issues associated with manufacturing laptop computers.

Your answer should consider:

  • the raw materials used
  • the energy and water needed
  • the effect on the local area.
[6 marks]
Mark scheme

Indicative content

Raw materials

  • Laptops contain metals such as gold, copper and aluminium, which are non-renewable, so they cannot be replaced once they have been extracted.
  • Mining for these metals causes erosion and contaminates the land around the mine.
  • Only a small amount of gold is found in each tonne of rock, so large amounts of rock must be mined to get enough for the laptops.
  • The plastic case is made from oil, which is a non-renewable fossil fuel.

Energy and water

  • Large amounts of energy from fossil fuels are used to power the factories that make the components, which releases carbon dioxide and adds to global warming.
  • Making the processor chips uses large volumes of water, which can leave rivers and reservoirs short of water for homes and farms.
  • The water used to make chips can be contaminated with chemicals and pollute rivers if it is not cleaned before it is released.
  • Transporting the materials and the finished laptops by road, ship and air burns fuel and adds to emissions.

Local area

  • Factories can release waste chemicals into the local area, which harms wildlife and people.
  • Mining destroys habitats, and the dust and noise affect people living nearby.
  • The metals used in a laptop are used up permanently, so manufacturing reduces the resources available for future generations.

Levels

  • Level 0 (0 marks): No rewardable content.
  • Level 1 (1–2 marks): Basic, independent points are made, showing elements of understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion will contain basic information with little linkage between points made or application to the context. (AO2)
  • Level 2 (3–4 marks): Demonstrates adequate understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion shows some linkages and lines of reasoning with some structure and application to the context. (AO2)
  • Level 3 (5–6 marks): Demonstrates comprehensive understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science to support the discussion being presented. (AO1) The discussion is well developed, with sustained lines of reasoning that are coherent and logically structured, and which clearly apply to the context. (AO2)

Level 3 responses must consider the raw materials, the energy and water, and the effect on the local area.

Do not accept 'renewable' as a description of plastic, oil or metals.

Example answers and how they were marked
Full marks6/6

Laptops contain gold, copper and aluminium, and these are non-renewable, so once they have been mined they cannot be replaced. Mining them causes erosion and contaminates the land, and a very large amount of rock has to be processed to get even a small amount of gold, so the damage is out of proportion to the metal used. Making the processor chips uses huge amounts of water, which can leave rivers and reservoirs low for local homes and farms, and the waste water can carry chemicals into rivers if it is not cleaned. The factories are powered by fossil fuels, which release carbon dioxide and add to global warming, and the finished laptops are flown around the world, which burns more fuel. So manufacturing one laptop pollutes the local area and uses up resources that cannot be replaced.

Why: Comprehensive, linked discussion covering all three bullets and applying each point to laptop manufacture: raw materials (1), energy and water (2) and effect on the local area (3), sustained to Level 3.

Some marks3/6

Laptops are made from metals such as copper and gold, which are non-renewable. Mining them causes erosion and damages the land. Factories that make laptops use a lot of electricity, which comes from burning fossil fuels, so carbon dioxide is released and this adds to global warming.

Why: Two bullets covered with some linkage to the laptop: non-renewable metals and mining damage (1), fossil fuels and carbon dioxide (2). The water and local-area bullet is missing, so it stays at Level 2.

Some marks1/6

Laptops contain metals like copper, and mining them can damage the land. Plastic is renewable because it can be recycled, so the plastic case is not a problem. Factories today do not pollute, so manufacturing laptops has no effect on global warming.

Why: One basic point only (mining damages the land) (1); the rest are misconceptions, including that plastic is renewable, so it remains at Level 1.

10Discuss6 marksManufacturing Technology Swap Remove

A design company replaces all of its desktop computers every two years.

The old computers are sent to landfill.

Discuss the environmental issues associated with the length of the company's replacement cycle.

Your answer should consider:

  • a short replacement cycle
  • a long replacement cycle
  • how the company could extend the life of its computers.
[6 marks]
Mark scheme

Indicative content

Short replacement cycle

  • Replacing the computers every two years means the old ones are thrown away more often, which adds to the e-waste sent to landfill.
  • Each new computer has to be manufactured, which uses metals that must be mined and uses energy and water.
  • More frequent manufacture and transport of new machines releases more carbon dioxide.
  • The chemicals in the discarded machines can leak into the soil and water at the landfill site.

Long replacement cycle

  • Keeping the computers for longer means fewer new machines are manufactured, so fewer raw materials and less energy and water are used.
  • Fewer computers are thrown away, so less e-waste goes to landfill and less pollution is released.
  • Older computers may be too slow to run the latest software, so staff wait longer for tasks to finish and the machines may use more energy to do the same work.
  • Older machines break down more often, which costs time to repair or replace parts.

Extending the life of the computers

  • Buying computers that can be upgraded, such as adding more RAM or a larger hard drive, allows the company to improve them instead of replacing the whole machine.
  • Repairing a faulty part, such as a failed power supply, keeps the rest of the computer in use and reduces waste.
  • Passing working computers to another department or donating them keeps them in use for longer.
  • Choosing machines that are not designed to fail after a set time avoids planned obsolescence.

Levels

  • Level 0 (0 marks): No rewardable content.
  • Level 1 (1–2 marks): Basic, independent points are made, showing elements of understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion will contain basic information with little linkage between points made or application to the context. (AO2)
  • Level 2 (3–4 marks): Demonstrates adequate understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion shows some linkages and lines of reasoning with some structure and application to the context. (AO2)
  • Level 3 (5–6 marks): Demonstrates comprehensive understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science to support the discussion being presented. (AO1) The discussion is well developed, with sustained lines of reasoning that are coherent and logically structured, and which clearly apply to the context. (AO2)

Level 3 responses must consider both a short and a long replacement cycle, as well as how the life of the computers could be extended.

Do not accept the claim that a long replacement cycle produces more e-waste.

Example answers and how they were marked
Full marks6/6

Replacing every computer every two years means the old ones go to landfill, where they add to e-waste and can leak chemicals into the soil. Each new computer has to be manufactured, which uses metals that must be mined, as well as energy and water, so a short cycle uses up far more of these resources. A longer cycle means fewer computers are made and thrown away, which reduces that pollution, but the old machines may be too slow to run the newest software, so staff wait longer and the computers may use more energy to do the same work. The company could extend the life of its computers by buying machines with parts that can be upgraded, such as adding more RAM, or by repairing a faulty power supply instead of replacing the whole computer, which reduces the waste sent to landfill.

Why: Covers all three bullets with sustained reasoning: short cycle and e-waste (1), long cycle and slower machines (2), and upgrading and repairing to extend life (3), applied to the company at Level 3.

Some marks4/6

A short replacement cycle is bad because the old computers are thrown away and end up in landfill, which causes e-waste. New computers have to be made, which uses up metals such as copper. A longer cycle means fewer computers are made, so fewer raw materials are used, but old computers might be slow with new software.

Why: Two bullets covered with some linkage: e-waste from a short cycle (1) and fewer materials from a long cycle (2). No discussion of how to extend the life, so it stays at Level 2.

Some marks2/6

A long replacement cycle is worse for the environment because keeping old computers means they use more electricity, so the company should replace them every year to save energy. Old computers also create more e-waste because they have been around for longer.

Why: One basic valid point (older computers may use more energy) (1); the reversal that replacing every year reduces environmental impact and that old computers create more e-waste is a misconception, so it remains at Level 1.

Questions by topic

More ways to revise Edexcel GCSE Computer Science (1CP2)

Teachers: build a paper, print it with the mark schemes at the end, and sign your school up to set your classes activities on every topic.

Fetch Decode Explain isn't affiliated with or endorsed by Pearson Edexcel.