Edexcel GCSE Computer Science (1CP2) Exam Questions

• A Blu-ray Disc (1)
• The only correct answer is A. The correct answer is Blu-ray Disc.
• B is not correct because a CD stores less data than a Blu-ray Disc, up to about 700 MB
• C is not correct because a DVD stores less data than a Blu-ray Disc, up to about 4.7 GB (single-layer) or 8.4 GB (dual-layer)
• D is not correct because magnetic tape is not an optical storage medium

Award one mark for any of the following up to a maximum of two marks:

• Program instructions are stored in main memory/RAM (1)
• The data used by the program is stored in main memory/RAM (1)
• The CPU fetches/reads instructions from main memory to execute them (1)
• The program can be run without the instructions being input again (1)

Allow 'the program is stored in memory' for one mark.

Do not accept answers about programs being stored on secondary storage, such as a hard disk or USB memory stick.

Do not accept answers that only describe the von Neumann architecture (e.g. having a CPU and memory) without stating that instructions are stored in main memory.

Award up to two marks for a linked description such as:

• Gives each process a share/a small amount (time slice) of the CPU time (1) so that several processes can run and appear to run at the same time (1)
• Decides which process will use the CPU next, e.g. by priority (1) so that the most important process is run first (1)
• Keeps track of the state of each process (ready/running/blocked) (1) so that each process is moved to the state it needs to be in (1)
• Moves a process that is waiting for input/a resource (e.g. a printer) to blocked (1) so that another process can use the CPU (1)

Do not award a mark for stating only that the operating system runs/controls the programs.

Do not award a mark for describing multitasking in general, e.g. 'the operating system runs more than one program at once', without saying how the operating system manages the processes.

Do not accept responses about memory management (e.g. loading a program into RAM), the user interface or user management.

Accept 'processor' for CPU.

Award up to two marks for a linked explanation such as:

• Only a limited number of different amplitude values can be stored (1) so each sample is rounded to the nearest available value and the digital wave does not match the analogue wave exactly (1)
• The wave is continuous but only a limited set of values can be represented (1) so amplitude detail/accuracy is lost (1)
• Quiet and loud parts of the sound may be stored as the same value (1) because there are too few values to tell them apart (1)
• The range of amplitudes that can be represented is limited (1) so the loudest/quietest parts of the sound cannot be stored accurately (1)

For both marks, the expansion must follow/associate with the statement.

Do not award marks for answers that say the sound cannot be stored or heard at all.

Do not award answers about the number of samples taken/sample rate, as the number of bits limits the amplitude values, not how often the wave is sampled.

Do not accept 'lower quality'/'less accurate'/'less detail' on its own without a link to the amplitude values that can be stored/the number of bit combinations.

Do not accept 'the file size is smaller' without a link to the accuracy or the range of values that can be stored.

Award up to two marks for a linked explanation such as:

• The file size is reduced (1) so the documents take less time to transmit/send (1)
• The compressed files are smaller (1) so they are more likely to be within the email attachment size limit (1)
• Less data is sent (1) so less bandwidth/data allowance is used (1)
• Fewer packets are needed (1) so the documents are received more quickly (1)

For both marks, the expansion must follow/associate with the statement.

Do not accept 'it saves storage space' on its own without linking to sending the documents.

Do not accept 'it makes the file smaller' as both the point and the reason.

Award up to two marks for a linked explanation such as:

• The user can identify what is in a file without opening it (1) because the name describes the contents (1)
• The user can search for a file using words from its name (1) because the file manager/search matches those words to the stored file name (1)
• The user can choose the correct file from several similar files (1) because the descriptive name distinguishes it from the other files (1)
• The user can sort/group related files together (1) because files with similar contents can share a word/phrase in their names (1)

For both marks, the expansion must follow/associate with the statement.

A correct point on its own can award 1 mark.

Do not accept 'it is easier to find' on its own without a linked reason that says the search/file manager uses words/terms in the file name to match the search.

Do not accept 'it is organised better' unless it is linked to how the name helps, e.g. sorting/grouping files by a shared word in their names.

Do not accept 'it is more secure' or 'the file opens faster' or 'it saves storage space' because a descriptive name does not make a file more secure, open faster or take less storage.

Do not award a second mark for repeating the same benefit, e.g. saying time is saved after saying the contents can be identified without opening the file.

Award up to two marks for a linked explanation such as:

• The WAN uses leased lines rented from telecommunications companies (1) so the company pays ongoing rental charges for the connections between its offices (1)
• The WAN covers a large geographical area (1) so more cabling/equipment must be paid for to connect the sites (1)
• The WAN connects networks in different locations (1) so more hardware, such as routers, is needed at each site, which adds to purchase and maintenance costs (1)
• The WAN connects more devices/networks (1) so more money is spent on hardware and management (1)

For both marks, the expansion must follow/associate with the statement.

The answer must relate to cost, e.g. paying rental/charges, buying more equipment or paying for maintenance.

Do not accept 'it is bigger' without saying that it covers a larger distance or that more equipment must be paid for.

Do not accept 'it is slower' as a reason for higher cost.

Do not accept 'the WAN is more complex' without expansion as to why this costs more.

Do not accept 'it uses satellites/wireless' unless linked to paying for long-distance infrastructure.

Award one mark for each of:

• − (negative sign) (1)
• 121 (1)

The correct answer is −121

Indicative content

Machine independence

• A high-level language is machine independent, so the same source code can be run on different types of computer with few or no changes.
• The company can write the program once and sell it to users with different computers, without rewriting the code for each type of computer.
• Only one version of the program needs to be written and maintained, so development takes the company less time.

Processor specificity

• A low-level language is processor-specific, so a program written for one processor will not run on a different processor without being rewritten.
• Assembly language instructions depend on the instruction set of the particular processor, so the company would need a separate version of the program for each type of computer.
• Writing a separate low-level version for every type of computer would take the company much longer than writing one high-level program.
• Low-level code gives direct control of the hardware of one processor, so it is better suited to device drivers than to a program that must run on many different computers.

Translation

• High-level source code is translated for each type of computer by a compiler or an interpreter, so one version of the source code is enough for all the users.
• Assembly language is translated into machine code by an assembler, and the assembler produces machine code for one specific processor only.
• Machine code is already in a form that one particular processor can execute directly, but the same machine code will not run on a different processor.
• Each high-level statement translates into several machine code instructions, so the programmer does not need to know the instruction set of the processor.

Levels

• Level 0 (0 marks): No rewardable content.
• Level 1 (1–2 marks): Basic, independent points are made, showing elements of understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion will contain basic information with little linkage between points made or application to the context. (AO2)
• Level 2 (3–4 marks): Demonstrates adequate understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion shows some linkages and lines of reasoning with some structure and application to the context. (AO2)
• Level 3 (5–6 marks): Demonstrates comprehensive understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science to support the discussion being presented. (AO1) The discussion is well developed, with sustained lines of reasoning that are coherent and logically structured, and which clearly apply to the context. (AO2)

Additional guidance

• Level 3 responses must cover both high-level machine independence and low-level processor specificity, with the effect on the company's decision.
• Do not award low-level language, assembly language or machine code as portable, or 'high-level languages are written in English/like English' as a reason for machine independence.

Indicative content

The output of each type of translator

• A compiler translates the whole program in one go and produces object code.
• The object code is saved as an executable file, which is already in machine code so the processor can run it directly.
• An interpreter does not produce object code, so no translated file exists for the company to save and sell.
• An interpreter translates one line at a time and executes it immediately, but that translation is not kept.

Whether the program has to be translated each time it is run

• Compiled code is translated once, so the executable can be run as many times as the customer likes without being translated again.
• If the source code is edited, the whole program has to be compiled again to produce a new executable.
• An interpreted program is translated again every time it is run, so a customer who runs the program often waits for translation at every run.
• An executable runs faster than interpreted code because it is already in machine code.

What the customer needs on their computer to run the program

• A customer who installs the executable needs no compiler on their computer, so the program will run straight away.
• If the company supplied the source code instead, the customer would need an interpreter installed, and it would have to be an interpreter for their type of computer.
• A customer given only the executable does not have the source code, so cannot change the program.

Conclusion

• A compiler is the better choice for this company, because the executable can be sold and the customer runs it without it being translated again and without being given the source code.
• Using an interpreter would mean supplying the source code to customers and translating the program on every run.

Levels

• Level 0 (0 marks): No rewardable content.
• Level 1 (1–2 marks): Basic, independent points are made, showing elements of understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion will contain basic information with little linkage between points made or application to the context. (AO2)
• Level 2 (3–4 marks): Demonstrates adequate understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion shows some linkages and lines of reasoning with some structure and application to the context. (AO2)
• Level 3 (5–6 marks): Demonstrates comprehensive understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science to support the discussion being presented. (AO1) The discussion is well developed, with sustained lines of reasoning that are coherent and logically structured, and which clearly apply to the context. (AO2)

Level 3 responses must cover all three bullets for this company's program, including translating once rather than on every run, and reach a conclusion.

Do not accept 'a compiler fixes errors' (a compiler reports syntax errors at the end of translation, it does not fix them) or 'a compiler is easier to use' with no link to output, translation or the customer. Do not accept answers about translating to assembly language.