Edexcel GCSE Computer Science (1CP2) Exam Questions

• A It can manipulate the hardware directly (1)
• The only correct answer is A. The correct answer is it can manipulate the hardware directly.
• B is not correct because data structures such as arrays and records are a characteristic of high-level languages
• C is not correct because low-level languages are processor/machine dependent, so they are not machine independent
• D is not correct because in a low-level language one instruction translates into one machine code instruction

• C The object code is saved as a separate file (1)
• The only correct answer is C. The correct answer is the object code is saved as a separate file.
• A is not correct because a compiled program is not translated again when it is run
• B is not correct because translating one line at a time is how an interpreter works
• D is not correct because the source code is not needed to run a compiled program

Award one mark for any of the following:

• Object code (1)
• Machine code (1)
• Executable code / an executable (1)

Allow object file.

Do not accept source code.

Do not accept high-level code.

Award one mark for any of the following up to a maximum of two marks:

• Translates/converts (high-level/source) code one line/statement at a time (1)
• Translates/converts the code and executes/runs each line as it goes (1)
• Executes/runs each line/statement immediately after it is translated (1)
• Reports/stops with an error message as soon as a syntax error is found (1)

Allow 'runs' for executes, 'converts' for translates and 'instruction' for line/statement

Do not accept translates the whole program before it is run

Do not accept produces/creates object code, an executable file or machine code that is saved

Award up to two marks for a linked description such as:

• Instructions can manipulate/control the hardware/memory/registers directly (1) so the driver can control the specific device it is written for (1)
• The code is written for one specific processor/architecture (1) so it works with the exact hardware it will control (1)
• The programmer controls exactly how memory/registers are used (1) so the code is efficient and needs little memory, which suits a device that has limited memory (1)
• Each instruction maps to one machine code instruction (1) so the driver code is small enough to fit in the memory of the device (1)

Extra detail, such as naming the device the driver controls, is not needed to earn the marks.

Do not accept 'it is closer to machine code' on its own: it must be developed to show how this helps the driver, e.g. it can control the hardware directly.

Do not accept 'it is faster/quicker' with no link to the hardware/device, e.g. the device responds quickly.

Do not accept 'it is easier to learn', 'it is easier to debug' or 'it takes less time to write'.

Award up to two marks for a linked explanation such as:

• The same source code can be used on different processors (1) because a compiler/interpreter for each processor translates it into that processor's machine code/instructions (1)
• The program is machine/processor independent (1) because the code is translated into the machine code/instructions of each processor it is run on (1)
• A different compiler/interpreter is used for each type of processor (1) so the same source code can be translated into each processor's machine code/instructions (1)
• The program can be moved/copied to a computer with a different processor (1) because a compiler/interpreter that produces code for that processor exists (1)

For both marks, the expansion must follow/associate with the statement.

Do not accept 'it is portable' without a linked reason about translation for different processors.

Do not accept 'it is easier to use/read/write' on its own without a linked reason about translation/processors.

Do not accept 'it is not written in binary'/'it is not machine code'/'it is not written in assembly language' as the reason without saying that the code is translated into each processor's machine code/instructions.

Do not accept the misconception that the program runs directly on any processor without being translated.

Award up to two marks for a linked explanation such as:

• The programmer can choose the most efficient instructions/registers to use (1) so the program completes its task in fewer steps (1)
• The programmer can optimise the code for the processor (1) because low-level instructions give direct control of registers/memory (1)
• Each low-level instruction maps to one machine code instruction (1) so fewer instructions are executed than for the equivalent high-level code (1)
• The translated code is smaller (1) so fewer instructions are fetched from memory and executed (1)

For both marks, the expansion must follow/associate with the statement.

Do not accept 'it is low-level' / 'it is closer to machine code' / 'low-level code is faster' on its own without a reason why it makes the program run faster.

Do not accept 'high-level code has to be translated' / 'high-level code is interpreted' on its own without saying why that makes the program slower.

Do not accept 'the code is smaller' on its own without saying that this means fewer instructions are fetched/executed.

Do not accept 'it is easier to write' or 'quicker to type' as a reason for faster execution.

Award up to two marks for a linked explanation such as:

• The interpreter translates and executes each line in turn (1) so it cannot continue past a line it cannot translate (1)
• The interpreter finds the error when it reaches that line (1) so it stops and displays an error message before later lines are executed (1)
• Each line is translated just before it is executed (1) so a syntax error in that line prevents that translation/execution from happening (1)
• The interpreter does not translate the whole program first (1) so it only discovers the error when that line is reached during execution (1)

For both marks, the expansion must follow/associate with the statement.

Do not accept 'the program crashes' without saying that the interpreter cannot translate/execute the line.

Do not accept answers about how a compiler reports errors.

Indicative content

Control of the hardware

• Low-level languages can read and write the contents of registers and memory addresses directly, so the firmware can take the values from the distance sensors without calling a library routine.
• Assembly language instructions can read from and write to specific input/output ports on the vacuum cleaner's processor, so the motors can be switched on and off directly.
• The programmer decides exactly which processor operations are carried out and in which order, which matters when the vacuum must reverse away from a step or an obstacle.
• A low-level language puts nothing between the program and the hardware, so the programmer can control the hardware of the vacuum cleaner precisely.

Efficiency of the code

• Assembly language code can be hand-optimised instruction by instruction, so the code that checks a sensor is as short as possible.
• The programmer can choose which registers hold values that are used again and again, which cuts down the number of memory accesses the firmware needs.
• A hand-written low-level program can be made compact, so it is more likely to fit in the small amount of memory the vacuum cleaner has.
• Because each instruction does one defined job, the time taken to react to a sensor reading is predictable, which suits firmware that must not overrun.

Link between the language and the processor

• Low-level languages are processor-specific, so the instructions used are those of the exact processor in the vacuum cleaner rather than general statements that need translating.
• Each assembly language instruction maps to one machine code instruction, so the programmer knows precisely which processor operation will be carried out by each line of code.
• An assembler turns each mnemonic into its machine code equivalent, so the machine code running on the vacuum cleaner's processor is exactly what the programmer wrote.
• Code written for a different processor would have to be rewritten, which is acceptable here because the vacuum cleaner always uses the same processor.

Levels

• Level 0 (0 marks): No rewardable content.
• Level 1 (1–2 marks): Basic, independent points are made, showing elements of understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion will contain basic information with little linkage between points made or application to the context. (AO2)
• Level 2 (3–4 marks): Demonstrates adequate understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion shows some linkages and lines of reasoning with some structure and application to the context. (AO2)
• Level 3 (5–6 marks): Demonstrates comprehensive understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science to support the discussion being presented. (AO1) The discussion is well developed, with sustained lines of reasoning that are coherent and logically structured, and which clearly apply to the context. (AO2)

Within Level 1, award 1 mark for a single basic point and 2 marks for two or more independent basic points; Level 2 requires the points to be linked to the vacuum cleaner; Level 3 requires both control of the hardware and efficiency of the code, and a few concise, linked sentences can reach Level 3, so extra length is not required.

Accept registers, memory addresses, input/output ports, machine code and mnemonics as ways of describing access to the hardware, and accept 'a low-level language is faster' as a basic point on its own. Do not award 'binary is a low-level language' (machine code is written in binary, but binary is not a language), or characteristics of high-level languages such as being easy to read or portable, as characteristics of a low-level language.

Indicative content

Machine independence

• A high-level language is machine independent, so the same source code can be run on different types of computer with few or no changes.
• The company can write the program once and sell it to users with different computers, without rewriting the code for each type of computer.
• Only one version of the program needs to be written and maintained, so development takes the company less time.

Processor specificity

• A low-level language is processor-specific, so a program written for one processor will not run on a different processor without being rewritten.
• Assembly language instructions depend on the instruction set of the particular processor, so the company would need a separate version of the program for each type of computer.
• Writing a separate low-level version for every type of computer would take the company much longer than writing one high-level program.
• Low-level code gives direct control of the hardware of one processor, so it is better suited to device drivers than to a program that must run on many different computers.

Translation

• High-level source code is translated for each type of computer by a compiler or an interpreter, so one version of the source code is enough for all the users.
• Assembly language is translated into machine code by an assembler, and the assembler produces machine code for one specific processor only.
• Machine code is already in a form that one particular processor can execute directly, but the same machine code will not run on a different processor.
• Each high-level statement translates into several machine code instructions, so the programmer does not need to know the instruction set of the processor.

Levels

• Level 0 (0 marks): No rewardable content.
• Level 1 (1–2 marks): Basic, independent points are made, showing elements of understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion will contain basic information with little linkage between points made or application to the context. (AO2)
• Level 2 (3–4 marks): Demonstrates adequate understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion shows some linkages and lines of reasoning with some structure and application to the context. (AO2)
• Level 3 (5–6 marks): Demonstrates comprehensive understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science to support the discussion being presented. (AO1) The discussion is well developed, with sustained lines of reasoning that are coherent and logically structured, and which clearly apply to the context. (AO2)

Additional guidance

• Level 3 responses must cover both high-level machine independence and low-level processor specificity, with the effect on the company's decision.
• Do not award low-level language, assembly language or machine code as portable, or 'high-level languages are written in English/like English' as a reason for machine independence.