Menu

Edexcel GCSE Computer Science (1CP2) Exam Questions

Build a practice paper from 604 exam-style questions, each with its mark scheme and example answers. Print it, or answer it on paper and then open the mark schemes. Or browse the questions by topic.

Build a paper

Topics (none ticked: all of them)
Question types (none ticked: all of them)

Practice paper

5 questions · 12 marks

Pick again
Print
1Multiple choice1 markCharacter Sets Swap Remove

A text file stores each character using 7-bit ASCII.

Identify the denary ASCII code for the space character.

[1 mark]
  • A32
  • B33
  • C48
  • D65
Mark scheme
  • A 32 (1)
  • The only correct answer is A. The correct answer is 32.
  • B is not correct because 33 is the ASCII code for the exclamation mark (!)
  • C is not correct because 48 is the ASCII code for the character 0
  • D is not correct because 65 is the ASCII code for the uppercase letter A
Example answers and how they were marked
Full marks1/1

A 32

Why: Correct option: the space character has the ASCII code 32 (1).

No marks0/1

C 48

Why: Near miss scoring 0: 48 is the ASCII code for the character 0, not the space character.

No marks0/1

D 65

Why: Misconception scoring 0: 65 is the ASCII code for the uppercase letter A, so a well-known code is given but not the code for a space.

2Short recall1 markSecondary Memory Swap Remove

Data is stored on optical discs as pits and lands.

Name the component in an optical disc drive that reads this data.

[1 mark]
Mark scheme

Award one mark for:

  • Laser (1)

Allow laser beam

Do not accept read/write head

Do not accept pits

Do not accept lands

Do not accept reflective surface

Do not accept magnet/magnetic

Example answers and how they were marked
Full marks1/1

Laser

Why: Laser is the creditworthy answer (1).

No marks0/1

A read/write head

Why: Read/write head is not accepted by the mark scheme; it reads magnetic media, not optical discs, so no marks are awarded.

No marks0/1

Pits and lands

Why: Pits and lands are what the laser reads, not the component that reads the data, so the mark scheme does not accept them.

3Short recall2 marksCompression Swap Remove

Files can be compressed before they are stored.

Define the term lossless compression.

[2 marks]
Mark scheme

Award one mark for any of the following up to a maximum of two marks:

  • Reduces/makes the size of a file smaller (1)
  • No data is lost/removed (during compression) (1)
  • The original file/data can be recreated/restored exactly (1)

Allow 'the compressed file takes up less storage space' for the first mark.

The second and third bullets are two ways of making the same point: award a maximum of one mark for them, so a response that says no data is lost and that the original file can be restored, but does not say the file is smaller, scores one mark.

Do not accept descriptions of lossy compression, e.g. 'it removes data that is not needed to make the file smaller'.

Ignore reference to download/transmission times, bandwidth and streaming, as these are benefits of compression and not part of the definition.

Example answers and how they were marked
Full marks2/2

Lossless compression reduces the size of a file without permanently removing any data, so the original file can be restored exactly.

Why: Reduces the size of a file (1) and no data is lost, so the original can be restored exactly (1); maximum of two marks reached.

Some marks1/2

It makes a file smaller so it downloads more quickly.

Why: Reduces the size of a file (1); the faster download is ignored as a benefit, not part of the definition.

No marks0/2

It removes data that is not needed to make the file smaller.

Why: Describes lossy compression, which the do-not-accept line rules out, so the mention of making the file smaller is not credited.

4Describe2 marksLow and High Level Languages Swap Remove

A device driver is software that allows the operating system to control a piece of hardware. Device drivers are often written in a low-level programming language.

Describe one reason why a low-level programming language is suitable for writing a device driver.

[2 marks]
Mark scheme

Award up to two marks for a linked description such as:

  • Instructions can manipulate/control the hardware/memory/registers directly (1) so the driver can control the specific device it is written for (1)
  • The code is written for one specific processor/architecture (1) so it works with the exact hardware it will control (1)
  • The programmer controls exactly how memory/registers are used (1) so the code is efficient and needs little memory, which suits a device that has limited memory (1)
  • Each instruction maps to one machine code instruction (1) so the driver code is small enough to fit in the memory of the device (1)

Extra detail, such as naming the device the driver controls, is not needed to earn the marks.

Do not accept 'it is closer to machine code' on its own: it must be developed to show how this helps the driver, e.g. it can control the hardware directly.

Do not accept 'it is faster/quicker' with no link to the hardware/device, e.g. the device responds quickly.

Do not accept 'it is easier to learn', 'it is easier to debug' or 'it takes less time to write'.

Example answers and how they were marked
Full marks2/2

Low-level instructions can manipulate the hardware and memory directly (1) so the driver can control the specific device it was written for, such as a sound card (1).

Why: Point about direct control of hardware/memory (1) linked to controlling the specific device (1). The named device is extra detail and is not needed.

Some marks1/2

Low-level instructions can manipulate the hardware directly.

Why: Correct point (1) but no linked development saying how this helps the device driver.

No marks0/2

It is closer to machine code so it runs faster than a high-level language.

Why: 'Closer to machine code' is not developed into how this helps the driver, and 'runs faster' is not linked to the hardware/device, so no mark.

5Discuss6 marksLow and High Level Languages Swap Remove

A software company is writing a new program that will be sold to users who have different types of computer. The program does not need to control the hardware of the computer directly. The company must decide whether to write the program in a high-level language or a low-level language.

Discuss whether the company should use a high-level language or a low-level language to write this program.

Your answer should consider:

  • machine independence
  • processor specificity
  • how the code is translated for each type of computer.
[6 marks]
Mark scheme

Indicative content

Machine independence

  • A high-level language is machine independent, so the same source code can be run on different types of computer with few or no changes.
  • The company can write the program once and sell it to users with different computers, without rewriting the code for each type of computer.
  • Only one version of the program needs to be written and maintained, so development takes the company less time.

Processor specificity

  • A low-level language is processor-specific, so a program written for one processor will not run on a different processor without being rewritten.
  • Assembly language instructions depend on the instruction set of the particular processor, so the company would need a separate version of the program for each type of computer.
  • Writing a separate low-level version for every type of computer would take the company much longer than writing one high-level program.
  • Low-level code gives direct control of the hardware of one processor, so it is better suited to device drivers than to a program that must run on many different computers.

Translation

  • High-level source code is translated for each type of computer by a compiler or an interpreter, so one version of the source code is enough for all the users.
  • Assembly language is translated into machine code by an assembler, and the assembler produces machine code for one specific processor only.
  • Machine code is already in a form that one particular processor can execute directly, but the same machine code will not run on a different processor.
  • Each high-level statement translates into several machine code instructions, so the programmer does not need to know the instruction set of the processor.

Levels

  • Level 0 (0 marks): No rewardable content.
  • Level 1 (1–2 marks): Basic, independent points are made, showing elements of understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion will contain basic information with little linkage between points made or application to the context. (AO2)
  • Level 2 (3–4 marks): Demonstrates adequate understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion shows some linkages and lines of reasoning with some structure and application to the context. (AO2)
  • Level 3 (5–6 marks): Demonstrates comprehensive understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science to support the discussion being presented. (AO1) The discussion is well developed, with sustained lines of reasoning that are coherent and logically structured, and which clearly apply to the context. (AO2)

Additional guidance

  • Level 3 responses must cover both high-level machine independence and low-level processor specificity, with the effect on the company's decision.
  • Do not award low-level language, assembly language or machine code as portable, or 'high-level languages are written in English/like English' as a reason for machine independence.
Example answers and how they were marked
Full marks6/6

A high-level language is machine independent, so the company can write the program once and it will run on different types of computer with few or no changes. A different compiler is used for each type of processor to translate that same source code into the machine code for that computer, so the company can sell one program to all of its users. A low-level language is processor-specific, so a program written in assembly for one processor will not run on a different one. The assembler produces machine code for one particular instruction set, so the company would need to write a separate version for each type of computer, which would take much longer. As the program does not need to control the hardware directly, the company should use a high-level language.

Why: Develops high-level machine independence with the compiler translating for each processor, and low-level processor specificity with the assembler producing machine code for one instruction set, both applied to the company's decision, in a coherent and sustained argument: Level 3, 6 marks.

Some marks3/6

A high-level language is machine independent, so the company can write the program once. A different compiler is used for each type of computer to translate the code, so users with different computers can all run the same program. A low-level language is processor-specific, so it would not be as suitable for the company.

Why: Machine independence is linked to the compiler and applied to the users, but processor specificity is only asserted and no translation of low-level code is given, so the reasoning is not sustained: Level 2, 3 marks.

Some marks1/6

High-level languages are machine independent because they are written in English, so the company can sell the program to anyone. Low-level languages are machine code, so they can be translated to run on any type of computer.

Why: One basic point that high-level languages are machine independent, applied by selling to anyone (1). 'Written in English' is not a reason for machine independence and low-level code is not portable, so neither is credited: Level 1, 1 mark.

Questions by topic

More ways to revise Edexcel GCSE Computer Science (1CP2)

Teachers: build a paper, print it with the mark schemes at the end, and sign your school up to set your classes activities on every topic.

Fetch Decode Explain isn't affiliated with or endorsed by Pearson Edexcel.