Edexcel GCSE Computer Science (1CP2) exam questions

Build a practice paper from 514 exam-style questions, each with its mark scheme and example answers. Print it, or answer it on paper and then open the mark schemes. Or browse the questions by topic.

Practice paper

6 questions · 19 marks

Pick again

1Short recall1 markTranslators Swap Remove

An interpreter translates high-level code.

State what happens to the translation of a program when an interpreter finds a syntax error.

[1 mark]

Mark scheme

Award one mark for any of the following:

Translation/execution stops (when the error is found) / the rest of the program is not translated/executed (1)

Allow stops/terminates/halts when the error is found

Do not accept shows/displays an error message on its own

Do not accept the whole program is translated and errors are reported at the end

Do not accept translates line by line on its own

Example answers and how they were marked

Full marks1/1

The translation stops as soon as the error is found, so the rest of the program is not translated.

Why: Translation stops when the error is found (1).

No marks0/1

An error message is displayed.

Why: Only an error message; it does not say translation stops, and the scheme does not accept a displayed error message on its own.

No marks0/1

The whole program is translated and all the errors are reported at the end.

Why: Describes a compiler; the scheme does not accept errors being reported at the end of translating the whole program.

2Short recall2 marksLow and High Level Languages Swap Remove

Programs written in a high-level language are often machine independent.

Define the term machine independence.

[2 marks]

Mark scheme

Award one mark for any of the following up to a maximum of two marks:

The (same) program/source code can run on different types/makes of computer/processor (1)
With few/no changes (to the program code) (1)
The same source code can be translated for each type of processor (1)
A different compiler/interpreter is used for each type of processor (1)
The program does not depend on one specific type of processor/hardware (1)
Only one version of the program needs to be written/kept (1)
The program is portable between different computers (1)

Allow 'different computers' as meaning different types of computer/processor.

Do not accept a program that will only run on one type of computer / the computer it was written on.

Do not accept written in machine code/binary, is translated into machine code, compiled/interpreted, is a low-level language.

Example answers and how they were marked

Full marks2/2

The same program can run on different types of computer (1) without being changed (1).

Why: Two creditworthy parts: runs on different types/makes of computer/processor (1); with few/no changes (1).

Some marks1/2

A program can run on different computers.

Why: Creditworthy point: can run on different types/makes of computer/processor (1), with 'different computers' allowed by the guidance. No second part about changes or translation.

No marks0/2

A program is written in machine code so the computer can understand it.

Why: Misconception: machine code is not machine independence; the mark scheme does not accept this, and no other creditworthy point is given.

3Describe2 marksTranslators Swap Remove

A compiler and an interpreter both translate source code.

Describe one difference between what a compiler produces and what an interpreter produces.

[2 marks]

Mark scheme

Award up to two marks for a linked description such as:

A compiler produces object code/machine code/an executable (file) (1) whereas an interpreter produces no object code/translated file (1)
A compiler produces a machine code file (1) that can be run on its own/without the compiler/translator being present (1)
An interpreter produces no object code/file (1) because it translates and executes each line instead of saving translated code (1)
The compiler's output can be saved/stored (1) and run again later, while interpreted code has to be translated again each time it is run (1)

Allow binary for machine code.

Allow executable/an executable for object code.

Do not accept responses about translating the whole program, reporting errors or the speed of execution.

Do not accept 'the interpreter translates/executes one line at a time' on its own: this is how it translates, not what it produces. It earns the development only when linked to no object code/translated file being produced.

Do not accept the interpreter producing object code/an executable.

Example answers and how they were marked

Full marks2/2

A compiler produces object code, which is saved as a file, whereas an interpreter does not produce a file because it translates and executes each line.

Why: Compiler produces object code (1) contrasted with the interpreter producing no object code/translated file (1).

Some marks1/2

The compiler produces machine code.

Why: Machine code/object code produced (1); there is no contrast with the interpreter, so the development is not earned.

No marks0/2

The interpreter produces object code for each line it translates.

Why: Reverses the translators' outputs: the interpreter produces no object code, so nothing is creditworthy.

4Explain2 marksLow and High Level Languages Swap Remove

High-level languages are designed to be easier to learn than low-level languages.

Explain one reason why a high-level language is easier to learn than a low-level language.

[2 marks]

Mark scheme

Award up to two marks for a linked explanation such as:

Statements are written in English-like words/use maths symbols (1) so the programmer can understand more easily what each one does (1)
The language uses meaningful names for variables/structured constructs such as loops (1) so the code is easier to read/follow (1)
One statement translates into several machine code instructions (1) so there are fewer instructions to learn/understand for the same task (1)

For both marks, the expansion must follow/associate with the statement.

Do not accept 'it is easier' / 'it is simpler' on its own, without saying what is easier/simpler.

Do not accept 'the computer understands it directly' / 'it does not need translating'.

Do not award answers about the program running faster or using less memory, as these are not about ease of learning.

Example answers and how they were marked

Full marks2/2

Statements are written in English-like words (1) so the programmer can understand more easily what each line does (1).

Why: Linked point (1) of English-like statements and reason (1) that these are easier to understand.

Some marks1/2

It uses meaningful names for variables (1) so it is easier.

Why: Point (1) that meaningful names for variables are used, but 'so it is easier' is not accepted as the linked reason.

No marks0/2

Because the computer can understand high-level code without translation.

Why: Misconception that high-level code is understood directly by the computer; no creditworthy characteristic of the language is given.

5Discuss6 marksTranslators Swap Remove

A company writes a photo editing program in a high-level language. The company will sell the finished program to customers. Each customer will install the program on their own computer and run it many times.

Discuss whether the company should use a compiler or an interpreter to translate the program before it is sold.

Your answer should include:

the output of each type of translator
whether the program has to be translated each time it is run
what the customer needs on their computer to run the program.

[6 marks]

Mark scheme

Indicative content

The output of each type of translator

A compiler translates the whole program in one go and produces object code.
The object code is saved as an executable file, which is already in machine code so the processor can run it directly.
An interpreter does not produce object code, so no translated file exists for the company to save and sell.
An interpreter translates one line at a time and executes it immediately, but that translation is not kept.

Whether the program has to be translated each time it is run

Compiled code is translated once, so the executable can be run as many times as the customer likes without being translated again.
If the source code is edited, the whole program has to be compiled again to produce a new executable.
An interpreted program is translated again every time it is run, so a customer who runs the program often waits for translation at every run.
An executable runs faster than interpreted code because it is already in machine code.

What the customer needs on their computer to run the program

A customer who installs the executable needs no compiler on their computer, so the program will run straight away.
If the company supplied the source code instead, the customer would need an interpreter installed, and it would have to be an interpreter for their type of computer.
A customer given only the executable does not have the source code, so cannot change the program.

Conclusion

A compiler is the better choice for this company, because the executable can be sold and the customer runs it without it being translated again and without being given the source code.
Using an interpreter would mean supplying the source code to customers and translating the program on every run.

Levels

Level 0 (0 marks): No rewardable content.
Level 1 (1–2 marks): Basic, independent points are made, showing elements of understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion will contain basic information with little linkage between points made or application to the context. (AO2)
Level 2 (3–4 marks): Demonstrates adequate understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion shows some linkages and lines of reasoning with some structure and application to the context. (AO2)
Level 3 (5–6 marks): Demonstrates comprehensive understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science to support the discussion being presented. (AO1) The discussion is well developed, with sustained lines of reasoning that are coherent and logically structured, and which clearly apply to the context. (AO2)

Level 3 responses must cover all three bullets for this company's program, including translating once rather than on every run, and reach a conclusion.

Do not accept 'a compiler fixes errors' (a compiler reports syntax errors at the end of translation, it does not fix them) or 'a compiler is easier to use' with no link to output, translation or the customer. Do not accept answers about translating to assembly language.

Example answers and how they were marked

Full marks6/6

The company should use a compiler. A compiler translates the whole program in one go and produces object code, which is saved as an executable file. This executable is already in machine code, so the customer's processor can run it directly. The program is translated only once, so a customer who runs the program many times does not wait for it to be translated again, and it runs faster than interpreted code would. An interpreter produces no object code, so the company would have nothing to sell as an executable. The customer would have to be given the source code and would need an interpreter installed on their computer, and the program would be translated again every time it was run.

Why: Level 3. Covers the output of both translators (executable from the compiler, no object code from the interpreter), the effect of translating once rather than on every run, and what the customer needs on their computer, all applied to the company selling the program, with a clear conclusion.

Some marks3/6

A compiler produces an executable file, which the company can save and sell to its customers. An interpreter does not produce an executable file, so the customer would need the source code and an interpreter installed on their computer to run the program. This means a compiler is better for the company, because customers can just run the file they are given.

Why: Level 2. Gives the output of both translators and links this to what the customer needs, with a conclusion, but never says the compiled program is translated once while an interpreted one is translated on every run, so the reasoning is not developed enough for Level 3.

No marks0/6

The company should use a compiler because it is easier to write programs with a compiler and it fixes the errors in the program before the customers get it.

Why: Level 0. No creditworthy point: 'easier to write programs' is not linked to the output, the translation each run or the customer, and 'fixes the errors' is a misconception, as the mark scheme's guidance says a compiler only reports errors at the end of translation.

6Discuss6 marksTranslators Swap Remove

A student is writing a program in a high-level language. The student runs the program after every small change to check that it works.

Discuss whether the student should use an interpreter or a compiler while writing and testing the program.

Your answer should include:

how each translator deals with a syntax error
how much of the program is translated at a time
how this affects the student's testing.

[6 marks]

Mark scheme

Indicative content

How each translator deals with a syntax error

An interpreter stops as soon as it finds a syntax error and displays an error message.
With an interpreter, the lines before the error have already been executed, so the student can see how far the program got before it stopped.
A compiler reports errors at the end of translation, so the student gets a list of all the syntax errors in the program in one go.

How much of the program is translated at a time

An interpreter translates one line at a time and executes each line immediately.
A compiler translates the whole program in one go before any of it is run.
A compiler produces object code, so after every change the whole program must be compiled again before the student can run it.
An interpreter produces no object code, so the student does not have to wait for the whole program to be translated before it runs.

How this affects the student's testing

An interpreter suits this student because the program can be run straight away after each small change.
The interpreter stops at the first error found, so the student fixes that error and runs the program again, but may only find the next error on the next run.
Reporting every error at the end of compilation means the student can fix several errors at once, but cannot run the program until the whole program compiles.
The student should use an interpreter while testing, and compile the finished program once it works.

Levels

Level 0 (0 marks): No rewardable content.
Level 1 (1–2 marks): Basic, independent points are made, showing elements of understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion will contain basic information with little linkage between points made or application to the context. (AO2)
Level 2 (3–4 marks): Demonstrates adequate understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion shows some linkages and lines of reasoning with some structure and application to the context. (AO2)
Level 3 (5–6 marks): Demonstrates comprehensive understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science to support the discussion being presented. (AO1) The discussion is well developed, with sustained lines of reasoning that are coherent and logically structured, and which clearly apply to the context. (AO2)

Level 3 responses must relate the way each translator works to the student's testing, not just describe the two translators.

Do not accept answers about run-time or logic errors where no comparison of the translators is made.

Example answers and how they were marked

Full marks6/6

The student should use an interpreter while testing. An interpreter translates one line at a time and executes each line straight away, so as soon as the student has made a small change the program can be run without waiting for the whole program to be translated. If there is a syntax error, the interpreter stops at that line and displays an error message, and the lines before it have already been executed, so the student knows exactly where the problem is. A compiler translates the whole program in one go and only reports the errors at the end, so the student would get a list of all the syntax errors, but could not run any of the program until the whole program compiled successfully.

Why: Explains how each translator deals with a syntax error, how much is translated at a time (one line executed immediately against the whole program at once) and links both to the student's testing, with a conclusion. Level 3.

Some marks4/6

An interpreter translates one line at a time and stops when it finds an error, so the student can see where the error is. A compiler translates the whole program and reports all the errors at the end. The interpreter is better for testing because the student can run the program straight away after a change.

Why: Adequate: correct points about error reporting and one line at a time, with a recommendation, but the effect on testing is only asserted rather than reasoned through, so the linkage is not sustained. Level 2.

Some marks1/6

The student should use a compiler because it translates the program one line at a time and stops at the first error, which makes testing quicker.

Why: The roles of the two translators are reversed, so the answer only makes a basic point about testing more quickly. Level 1.

Edexcel GCSE Computer Science (1CP2) Exam Questions

Build a paper

Practice paper

Questions by topic

2.1 Binary

2.2 Data representation

2.3 Data storage and compression

3.1 Hardware

3.2 Software

3.3 Programming languages

4.1 Networks

More ways to revise Edexcel GCSE Computer Science (1CP2)