Edexcel GCSE Computer Science (1CP2) Exam Questions

Award up to two marks for a linked description such as:

• Instructions can manipulate/control the hardware/memory/registers directly (1) so the driver can control the specific device it is written for (1)
• The code is written for one specific processor/architecture (1) so it works with the exact hardware it will control (1)
• The programmer controls exactly how memory/registers are used (1) so the code is efficient and needs little memory, which suits a device that has limited memory (1)
• Each instruction maps to one machine code instruction (1) so the driver code is small enough to fit in the memory of the device (1)

Extra detail, such as naming the device the driver controls, is not needed to earn the marks.

Do not accept 'it is closer to machine code' on its own: it must be developed to show how this helps the driver, e.g. it can control the hardware directly.

Do not accept 'it is faster/quicker' with no link to the hardware/device, e.g. the device responds quickly.

Do not accept 'it is easier to learn', 'it is easier to debug' or 'it takes less time to write'.

Indicative content

How malware could affect the charity's computers

• A virus could damage or delete the charity's files, such as its records of donations.
• Spyware could record keystrokes and send staff passwords or personal data to a hacker.
• A Trojan horse could hide malicious code inside a useful-looking program that a volunteer downloads, so it is installed without the user knowing.
• Malware could spread from one laptop to another through files shared on the charity's network, so more laptops become infected and more files are lost.

How anti-malware software finds and deals with malware

• It scans files and compares their code with a database of known malware patterns (signatures) to identify a match.
• It can apply rules (heuristics) to decide whether a program is behaving suspiciously.
• A suspicious file can be run in a sandbox to see whether its behaviour is malicious.
• When malware is found, the file is quarantined so that it cannot run, and it can be deleted.
• Downloads and email attachments can be scanned before a member of staff opens them.

What else the charity must do for the anti-malware software to be effective

• The database of malware definitions must be kept up to date, or new malware will not be recognised.
• Staff and volunteers should be trained not to open unexpected attachments or download from unreliable sites.
• Backups are still needed, because anti-malware cannot repair files that malware has already damaged.
• Scheduled scans must be allowed to run on all 15 laptops, so that malware is found even if no one opens the file.

Levels

• Level 0 (0 marks): No rewardable content.
• Level 1 (1–2 marks): Basic, independent points are made, showing elements of understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion will contain basic information with little linkage between points made or application to the context. (AO2)
• Level 2 (3–4 marks): Demonstrates adequate understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion shows some linkages and lines of reasoning with some structure and application to the context. (AO2)
• Level 3 (5–6 marks): Demonstrates comprehensive understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science to support the discussion being presented. (AO1) The discussion is well developed, with sustained lines of reasoning that are coherent and logically structured, and which clearly apply to the context. (AO2)

Level 3 responses must cover both how malware could affect the computers and how anti-malware software finds or deals with it; a brief deal-with point and an unexplained update point, with no identification method and no effect on the charity's files, are Level 1.

Do not accept anti-malware software described as a firewall, or 'scans files'/'finds viruses' on its own as a method of identifying malware.

Indicative content

The output of each type of translator

• A compiler translates the whole program in one go and produces object code.
• The object code is saved as an executable file, which is already in machine code so the processor can run it directly.
• An interpreter does not produce object code, so no translated file exists for the company to save and sell.
• An interpreter translates one line at a time and executes it immediately, but that translation is not kept.

Whether the program has to be translated each time it is run

• Compiled code is translated once, so the executable can be run as many times as the customer likes without being translated again.
• If the source code is edited, the whole program has to be compiled again to produce a new executable.
• An interpreted program is translated again every time it is run, so a customer who runs the program often waits for translation at every run.
• An executable runs faster than interpreted code because it is already in machine code.

What the customer needs on their computer to run the program

• A customer who installs the executable needs no compiler on their computer, so the program will run straight away.
• If the company supplied the source code instead, the customer would need an interpreter installed, and it would have to be an interpreter for their type of computer.
• A customer given only the executable does not have the source code, so cannot change the program.

Conclusion

• A compiler is the better choice for this company, because the executable can be sold and the customer runs it without it being translated again and without being given the source code.
• Using an interpreter would mean supplying the source code to customers and translating the program on every run.

Levels

• Level 0 (0 marks): No rewardable content.
• Level 1 (1–2 marks): Basic, independent points are made, showing elements of understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion will contain basic information with little linkage between points made or application to the context. (AO2)
• Level 2 (3–4 marks): Demonstrates adequate understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion shows some linkages and lines of reasoning with some structure and application to the context. (AO2)
• Level 3 (5–6 marks): Demonstrates comprehensive understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science to support the discussion being presented. (AO1) The discussion is well developed, with sustained lines of reasoning that are coherent and logically structured, and which clearly apply to the context. (AO2)

Level 3 responses must cover all three bullets for this company's program, including translating once rather than on every run, and reach a conclusion.

Do not accept 'a compiler fixes errors' (a compiler reports syntax errors at the end of translation, it does not fix them) or 'a compiler is easier to use' with no link to output, translation or the customer. Do not accept answers about translating to assembly language.