Edexcel GCSE Computer Science (1CP2) Exam Questions

• B At the end of translating the program (1)
• The only correct answer is B. The correct answer is at the end of translating the program.
• A is not correct because a compiler translates the whole program and does not report an error after each line; reporting after each line is how an interpreter behaves
• C is not correct because a compiler does not stop at the first error; it finishes translating and reports the errors it finds at the end
• D is not correct because syntax errors are found during translation, before the object code is run

Award one mark for:

• The whole program (before it is run) (1)

Allow all of the code/the entire program/the whole program in one go

Do not accept one line/statement at a time or each line as it is executed

Do not accept translating only the lines that contain errors

Indicative content

Control of the hardware

• Low-level languages can read and write the contents of registers and memory addresses directly, so the firmware can take the values from the distance sensors without calling a library routine.
• Assembly language instructions can read from and write to specific input/output ports on the vacuum cleaner's processor, so the motors can be switched on and off directly.
• The programmer decides exactly which processor operations are carried out and in which order, which matters when the vacuum must reverse away from a step or an obstacle.
• A low-level language puts nothing between the program and the hardware, so the programmer can control the hardware of the vacuum cleaner precisely.

Efficiency of the code

• Assembly language code can be hand-optimised instruction by instruction, so the code that checks a sensor is as short as possible.
• The programmer can choose which registers hold values that are used again and again, which cuts down the number of memory accesses the firmware needs.
• A hand-written low-level program can be made compact, so it is more likely to fit in the small amount of memory the vacuum cleaner has.
• Because each instruction does one defined job, the time taken to react to a sensor reading is predictable, which suits firmware that must not overrun.

Link between the language and the processor

• Low-level languages are processor-specific, so the instructions used are those of the exact processor in the vacuum cleaner rather than general statements that need translating.
• Each assembly language instruction maps to one machine code instruction, so the programmer knows precisely which processor operation will be carried out by each line of code.
• An assembler turns each mnemonic into its machine code equivalent, so the machine code running on the vacuum cleaner's processor is exactly what the programmer wrote.
• Code written for a different processor would have to be rewritten, which is acceptable here because the vacuum cleaner always uses the same processor.

Levels

• Level 0 (0 marks): No rewardable content.
• Level 1 (1–2 marks): Basic, independent points are made, showing elements of understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion will contain basic information with little linkage between points made or application to the context. (AO2)
• Level 2 (3–4 marks): Demonstrates adequate understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion shows some linkages and lines of reasoning with some structure and application to the context. (AO2)
• Level 3 (5–6 marks): Demonstrates comprehensive understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science to support the discussion being presented. (AO1) The discussion is well developed, with sustained lines of reasoning that are coherent and logically structured, and which clearly apply to the context. (AO2)

Within Level 1, award 1 mark for a single basic point and 2 marks for two or more independent basic points; Level 2 requires the points to be linked to the vacuum cleaner; Level 3 requires both control of the hardware and efficiency of the code, and a few concise, linked sentences can reach Level 3, so extra length is not required.

Accept registers, memory addresses, input/output ports, machine code and mnemonics as ways of describing access to the hardware, and accept 'a low-level language is faster' as a basic point on its own. Do not award 'binary is a low-level language' (machine code is written in binary, but binary is not a language), or characteristics of high-level languages such as being easy to read or portable, as characteristics of a low-level language.

Indicative content

Ease of learning, use and debug

• High-level language statements are written in English-like words and mathematical symbols, so the students can read the quiz game code and understand what each line does.
• The language is easier to learn than a low-level language, so students who are new to programming can start writing the quiz game quickly.
• Errors are easier to find and fix because the code is readable; for example, the students can check a line that updates a score against the rule they intended.
• The students do not need to know how the processor carries out each statement, so they can concentrate on the quiz questions and rules.

Data structures

• High-level languages provide lists or arrays, so the names and scores of all the players can be stored under one name and processed with a loop.
• A record can store a player's name and score as one item; in some languages a dictionary or class can be used instead, which keeps related data together.
• Using a data structure makes the code shorter and easier to understand than separate variables for every player's name and score.

Built-in functions and library routines

• High-level languages provide built-in functions such as print and input, so the students can display a question and read a player's answer without writing the underlying code.
• Library routines such as a random number generator can be used to choose quiz questions, saving the students time.
• String-handling routines can check or compare a player's answer, so the students do not have to write these routines themselves.
• Reusing tested routines reduces the amount of code the students write and can reduce errors in the quiz game.

Levels

• Level 0 (0 marks): No rewardable content.
• Level 1 (1–2 marks): Basic, independent points are made, showing elements of understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion will contain basic information with little linkage between points made or application to the context. (AO2)
• Level 2 (3–4 marks): Demonstrates adequate understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion shows some linkages and lines of reasoning with some structure and application to the context. (AO2)
• Level 3 (5–6 marks): Demonstrates comprehensive understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science to support the discussion being presented. (AO1) The discussion is well developed, with sustained lines of reasoning that are coherent and logically structured, and which clearly apply to the context. (AO2)

Additional guidance: Credit only points applied to the quiz game and the students; comparison with low-level languages is not required, but a correct contrast may support a point if it is applied. Do not award generic claims such as 'high-level programs run faster', 'work on any computer' or 'students do not need to learn syntax' unless they are justified for the quiz game.

Level 3 responses must cover all three bullet areas with linked reasoning that explains why the characteristic helps the students finish the game quickly with few errors; an answer covering only two bullet areas is limited to Level 2. Do not award the idea that high-level code is already machine code or is understood directly by the processor. Accept dictionaries or classes as equivalents of records.