Edexcel GCSE Computer Science (1CP2) Exam Questions

• B Compiler (1)
• The only correct answer is B. The correct answer is compiler.
• A is not correct because an assembler translates assembly language code into machine code, not a high-level program
• C is not correct because an interpreter translates and executes the code line by line, without producing a complete machine code program first
• D is not correct because a linker combines object code files into a single executable, it does not translate source code

Award up to two marks for a linked explanation such as:

• The interpreter translates and executes each line in turn (1) so it cannot continue past a line it cannot translate (1)
• The interpreter finds the error when it reaches that line (1) so it stops and displays an error message before later lines are executed (1)
• Each line is translated just before it is executed (1) so a syntax error in that line prevents that translation/execution from happening (1)
• The interpreter does not translate the whole program first (1) so it only discovers the error when that line is reached during execution (1)

For both marks, the expansion must follow/associate with the statement.

Do not accept 'the program crashes' without saying that the interpreter cannot translate/execute the line.

Do not accept answers about how a compiler reports errors.

Award up to two marks for a linked explanation such as:

• The compiler translates the whole program into machine code before it is run (1) so no translation is needed while the program is executing (1)
• The machine code/object code is already produced before execution (1) so the CPU can carry out the instructions directly without translating them (1)
• The compiled program does not need an interpreter at run time (1) so no time is spent translating each line before it is executed (1)

For both marks, the expansion must follow/associate with the statement.

A statement that translation happens before execution, with no linked reason for faster running, earns 1 mark only.

Do not accept 'faster to run' or 'quicker' on its own without a reason linked to translation before/during execution.

Do not accept 'compiled code is optimised' or 'compilation takes less time' without linking this to translation before execution/at run time.

Do not accept answers about the compiler being installed or available.

The question asks why a compiled program usually runs faster, so answers must refer to when translation happens, not just general performance claims.

Indicative content

Machine independence

• A high-level language is machine independent, so the same source code can be run on different types of computer with few or no changes.
• The company can write the program once and sell it to users with different computers, without rewriting the code for each type of computer.
• Only one version of the program needs to be written and maintained, so development takes the company less time.

Processor specificity

• A low-level language is processor-specific, so a program written for one processor will not run on a different processor without being rewritten.
• Assembly language instructions depend on the instruction set of the particular processor, so the company would need a separate version of the program for each type of computer.
• Writing a separate low-level version for every type of computer would take the company much longer than writing one high-level program.
• Low-level code gives direct control of the hardware of one processor, so it is better suited to device drivers than to a program that must run on many different computers.

Translation

• High-level source code is translated for each type of computer by a compiler or an interpreter, so one version of the source code is enough for all the users.
• Assembly language is translated into machine code by an assembler, and the assembler produces machine code for one specific processor only.
• Machine code is already in a form that one particular processor can execute directly, but the same machine code will not run on a different processor.
• Each high-level statement translates into several machine code instructions, so the programmer does not need to know the instruction set of the processor.

Levels

• Level 0 (0 marks): No rewardable content.
• Level 1 (1–2 marks): Basic, independent points are made, showing elements of understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion will contain basic information with little linkage between points made or application to the context. (AO2)
• Level 2 (3–4 marks): Demonstrates adequate understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion shows some linkages and lines of reasoning with some structure and application to the context. (AO2)
• Level 3 (5–6 marks): Demonstrates comprehensive understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science to support the discussion being presented. (AO1) The discussion is well developed, with sustained lines of reasoning that are coherent and logically structured, and which clearly apply to the context. (AO2)

Additional guidance

• Level 3 responses must cover both high-level machine independence and low-level processor specificity, with the effect on the company's decision.
• Do not award low-level language, assembly language or machine code as portable, or 'high-level languages are written in English/like English' as a reason for machine independence.