Menu

Edexcel GCSE Computer Science (1CP2) Exam Questions

Build a practice paper from 604 exam-style questions, each with its mark scheme and example answers. Print it, or answer it on paper and then open the mark schemes. Or browse the questions by topic.

Build a paper

Topics (none ticked: all of them)
Question types (none ticked: all of them)

Practice paper

4 questions · 15 marks

Pick again
Print
1Short recall1 markCompression Swap Remove

A company backs up its files to an external hard drive.

Give one reason why the company compresses the files before backing them up.

[1 mark]
Mark scheme

Award one mark for any of the following:

  • More files/data can be stored (in the same storage space) (1)
  • The files take up less storage space (1)
  • The backup is quicker/faster to complete (1)
  • Less data needs to be transferred to the backup device (1)

Do not accept 'makes the files more secure' or 'encrypts the files'.

Example answers and how they were marked
Full marks1/1

The compressed files take up less storage space, so more files can be backed up.

Why: The files take up less storage space (1).

No marks0/1

It reduces the amount of disk fragmentation.

Why: Near-miss: compression does not reduce disk fragmentation.

No marks0/1

It encrypts the files so they are safer if the drive is stolen.

Why: Misconception: compression does not encrypt files, and security is not accepted.

2Describe2 marksUtility Software Swap Remove

A student has a large number of photographs stored on a computer.

Describe the purpose of data compression software.

[2 marks]
Mark scheme

Award up to two marks for a linked description such as:

  • Makes a file/files smaller (1) so less storage space is needed on the disk (1)
  • Reduces the size of the data (1) so it takes less time to upload/download/transfer the file (1)
  • Compresses files/folders into a single file (1) so an attachment is under the size limit for email (1)
  • Reduces the size of the files (1) so more of them fit onto a storage device/backup media (1)

Do not accept 'it compresses the files' on its own, as this repeats the question.

Do not accept responses about protecting files from malware/viruses or about deleting files.

Example answers and how they were marked
Full marks2/2

It makes the files smaller (1) so that they use less storage space on the computer and more of them fit on the disk (1).

Why: The point (1) and a linked development giving the benefit (1).

Some marks1/2

It makes files smaller.

Why: This is the point (1) but there is no development of what the smaller size leads to, so only one mark.

No marks0/2

It protects the files from viruses so that they cannot be damaged.

Why: This describes anti-malware software, which the mark scheme does not accept; no creditworthy point is made.

3Discuss6 marksUtility Software Swap Remove

A charity has 15 laptops used by staff and volunteers. Staff often download files from the internet and open email attachments. The charity's manager is considering installing anti-malware software on every laptop.

Discuss the use of anti-malware software to protect the charity's computers.

Your answer should consider:

  • how malware could affect the charity's computers
  • how anti-malware software finds and deals with malware
  • what else the charity must do for the anti-malware software to be effective
[6 marks]
Mark scheme

Indicative content

How malware could affect the charity's computers

  • A virus could damage or delete the charity's files, such as its records of donations.
  • Spyware could record keystrokes and send staff passwords or personal data to a hacker.
  • A Trojan horse could hide malicious code inside a useful-looking program that a volunteer downloads, so it is installed without the user knowing.
  • Malware could spread from one laptop to another through files shared on the charity's network, so more laptops become infected and more files are lost.

How anti-malware software finds and deals with malware

  • It scans files and compares their code with a database of known malware patterns (signatures) to identify a match.
  • It can apply rules (heuristics) to decide whether a program is behaving suspiciously.
  • A suspicious file can be run in a sandbox to see whether its behaviour is malicious.
  • When malware is found, the file is quarantined so that it cannot run, and it can be deleted.
  • Downloads and email attachments can be scanned before a member of staff opens them.

What else the charity must do for the anti-malware software to be effective

  • The database of malware definitions must be kept up to date, or new malware will not be recognised.
  • Staff and volunteers should be trained not to open unexpected attachments or download from unreliable sites.
  • Backups are still needed, because anti-malware cannot repair files that malware has already damaged.
  • Scheduled scans must be allowed to run on all 15 laptops, so that malware is found even if no one opens the file.

Levels

  • Level 0 (0 marks): No rewardable content.
  • Level 1 (1–2 marks): Basic, independent points are made, showing elements of understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion will contain basic information with little linkage between points made or application to the context. (AO2)
  • Level 2 (3–4 marks): Demonstrates adequate understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion shows some linkages and lines of reasoning with some structure and application to the context. (AO2)
  • Level 3 (5–6 marks): Demonstrates comprehensive understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science to support the discussion being presented. (AO1) The discussion is well developed, with sustained lines of reasoning that are coherent and logically structured, and which clearly apply to the context. (AO2)

Level 3 responses must cover both how malware could affect the computers and how anti-malware software finds or deals with it; a brief deal-with point and an unexplained update point, with no identification method and no effect on the charity's files, are Level 1.

Do not accept anti-malware software described as a firewall, or 'scans files'/'finds viruses' on its own as a method of identifying malware.

Example answers and how they were marked
Full marks6/6

A virus could spread through the files the volunteers download and delete the charity's donation records, and spyware could record staff keystrokes and send passwords to a hacker. The anti-malware software would scan each laptop, including downloaded files and email attachments, and compare their code with a database of known malware patterns. If a match is found, the file is quarantined so that it cannot run, and it can then be deleted, so one infected laptop is less likely to pass malware to the other 14. The database of definitions must be kept up to date, because new malware will not be recognised by an old database. The manager should also train staff not to open unexpected attachments, and keep backups, because anti-malware cannot repair files that have already been damaged.

Why: Level 3: the effects of a virus and spyware are applied to the charity's laptops and records, and signature comparison, quarantine and deletion are explained and linked to stopping the spread (AO1/AO2), with accurate limits on what the software can do.

Some marks2/6

The anti-malware software scans the laptops and finds viruses. When it finds one it deletes the file so the laptop is safe. The charity should keep the software updated.

Why: Level 1 (2 marks): basic, independent points are made — deleting the infected file and keeping the software updated — but there is no identification method (signatures, heuristics or a sandbox), no explanation of how malware could affect the charity, and little linkage or application.

No marks0/6

The anti-malware software is a firewall that stops hackers getting into the laptops from the internet, and it scans the files for viruses.

Why: Level 0: describing anti-malware as a firewall is a misconception and is not credited, and bare 'scans the files for viruses' is not accepted on its own as a method of identifying malware, so there is no rewardable content.

4Discuss6 marksTranslators Swap Remove

A student is writing a program in a high-level language. The student runs the program after every small change to check that it works.

Discuss whether the student should use an interpreter or a compiler while writing and testing the program.

Your answer should include:

  • how each translator deals with a syntax error
  • how much of the program is translated at a time
  • how this affects the student's testing.
[6 marks]
Mark scheme

Indicative content

How each translator deals with a syntax error

  • An interpreter stops as soon as it finds a syntax error and displays an error message.
  • With an interpreter, the lines before the error have already been executed, so the student can see how far the program got before it stopped.
  • A compiler reports errors at the end of translation, so the student gets a list of all the syntax errors in the program in one go.

How much of the program is translated at a time

  • An interpreter translates one line at a time and executes each line immediately.
  • A compiler translates the whole program in one go before any of it is run.
  • A compiler produces object code, so after every change the whole program must be compiled again before the student can run it.
  • An interpreter produces no object code, so the student does not have to wait for the whole program to be translated before it runs.

How this affects the student's testing

  • An interpreter suits this student because the program can be run straight away after each small change.
  • The interpreter stops at the first error found, so the student fixes that error and runs the program again, but may only find the next error on the next run.
  • Reporting every error at the end of compilation means the student can fix several errors at once, but cannot run the program until the whole program compiles.
  • The student should use an interpreter while testing, and compile the finished program once it works.

Levels

  • Level 0 (0 marks): No rewardable content.
  • Level 1 (1–2 marks): Basic, independent points are made, showing elements of understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion will contain basic information with little linkage between points made or application to the context. (AO2)
  • Level 2 (3–4 marks): Demonstrates adequate understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion shows some linkages and lines of reasoning with some structure and application to the context. (AO2)
  • Level 3 (5–6 marks): Demonstrates comprehensive understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science to support the discussion being presented. (AO1) The discussion is well developed, with sustained lines of reasoning that are coherent and logically structured, and which clearly apply to the context. (AO2)

Level 3 responses must relate the way each translator works to the student's testing, not just describe the two translators.

Do not accept answers about run-time or logic errors where no comparison of the translators is made.

Example answers and how they were marked
Full marks6/6

The student should use an interpreter while testing. An interpreter translates one line at a time and executes each line straight away, so as soon as the student has made a small change the program can be run without waiting for the whole program to be translated. If there is a syntax error, the interpreter stops at that line and displays an error message, and the lines before it have already been executed, so the student knows exactly where the problem is. A compiler translates the whole program in one go and only reports the errors at the end, so the student would get a list of all the syntax errors, but could not run any of the program until the whole program compiled successfully.

Why: Explains how each translator deals with a syntax error, how much is translated at a time (one line executed immediately against the whole program at once) and links both to the student's testing, with a conclusion. Level 3.

Some marks4/6

An interpreter translates one line at a time and stops when it finds an error, so the student can see where the error is. A compiler translates the whole program and reports all the errors at the end. The interpreter is better for testing because the student can run the program straight away after a change.

Why: Adequate: correct points about error reporting and one line at a time, with a recommendation, but the effect on testing is only asserted rather than reasoned through, so the linkage is not sustained. Level 2.

Some marks1/6

The student should use a compiler because it translates the program one line at a time and stops at the first error, which makes testing quicker.

Why: The roles of the two translators are reversed, so the answer only makes a basic point about testing more quickly. Level 1.

Questions by topic

More ways to revise Edexcel GCSE Computer Science (1CP2)

Teachers: build a paper, print it with the mark schemes at the end, and sign your school up to set your classes activities on every topic.

Fetch Decode Explain isn't affiliated with or endorsed by Pearson Edexcel.