Edexcel GCSE Computer Science (1CP2) Exam Questions

• B To reduce the time taken to transmit a file (1)
• The only correct answer is B. The correct answer is to reduce the time taken to transmit a file.
• A is not correct because compression reduces file size, which can reduce the number of packets sent
• C is not correct because lossy compression can reduce the quality of a file
• D is not correct because encryption, not compression, can make a file harder to open

• D Time slice (1)
• The only correct answer is D. The correct answer is time slice.
• A is not correct because a process is a program that is being run
• B is not correct because round robin is a scheduling method that takes turns, not the period of CPU time itself
• C is not correct because a scheduler decides which process runs next

Award up to two marks for a linked description such as:

• It controls the motors/rotors (1) so that the drone can take off, hover, turn and land (1)
• It keeps the drone stable/level automatically (1) by taking readings from a sensor (accelerometer/gyroscope/GPS) (1)
• It receives signals from the remote control (1) and changes the speed of the motors to steer the drone (1)
• It monitors the battery level (1) and brings the drone back to the ground before the battery runs out (1)

The development must relate to the function given in the point.

Accept a named function that the embedded system controls, e.g. 'it keeps the drone level', as the first mark (1).

Award the second mark only when the development gives a specific outcome or detail of that function, e.g. 'so that the drone can take off, hover, turn and land' or 'by changing the motor speeds to keep it level'.

Do not award the second mark for a generic outcome such as 'so it works', 'so it can fly' or 'so the drone moves'.

A bare 'it controls the motors so it can fly' therefore earns the first mark only.

Allow any other specific function of a drone that is carried out by the embedded system.

Do not accept 'it flies the drone' / 'it is the drone's brain' / 'it makes the drone work' without a named function being controlled.

Do not accept answers that describe the user or the remote control flying the drone with no function carried out by the embedded system.

Award up to two marks for a linked description such as:

• Repeated words/patterns are found (1) and stored once in a dictionary with a code (1)
• Each repeated word/pattern is replaced by a shorter code (1) so fewer bits are needed to store the text (1)
• No data is removed (1) so the original text can be recreated exactly (1)
• The compressed file is smaller (1) but all the original characters can still be restored (1)

Do not accept answers that say data is permanently removed or quality is reduced.

Award up to two marks for a linked explanation such as:

• Only a limited number of different amplitude values can be stored (1) so each sample is rounded to the nearest available value and the digital wave does not match the analogue wave exactly (1)
• The wave is continuous but only a limited set of values can be represented (1) so amplitude detail/accuracy is lost (1)
• Quiet and loud parts of the sound may be stored as the same value (1) because there are too few values to tell them apart (1)
• The range of amplitudes that can be represented is limited (1) so the loudest/quietest parts of the sound cannot be stored accurately (1)

For both marks, the expansion must follow/associate with the statement.

Do not award marks for answers that say the sound cannot be stored or heard at all.

Do not award answers about the number of samples taken/sample rate, as the number of bits limits the amplitude values, not how often the wave is sampled.

Do not accept 'lower quality'/'less accurate'/'less detail' on its own without a link to the amplitude values that can be stored/the number of bit combinations.

Do not accept 'the file size is smaller' without a link to the accuracy or the range of values that can be stored.

Award up to two marks for a linked explanation such as:

• (Computers) are made of electronic components/switches/transistors that have two states, on/off (1) so binary's two values 0 and 1 can represent these states (1)
• Data stored as binary is more resistant to errors (1) because only two voltage levels/states need to be distinguished, so electrical noise/interference is less likely to be misread as a different value (1)
• Circuits that only need to distinguish two states are simpler/cheaper to manufacture (1) because each component only needs to hold one of two stable states (1)

For both marks, the expansion must follow/associate with the statement.

Do not accept 'computers only understand 0s and 1s' as a reason on its own without saying what the two states are or why binary matches them.

Do not accept 'computers are digital' or 'that is how computers work' without expansion.

Do not accept 'binary is easier to read/write' or 'binary is easier to understand' as a reason for using binary.

Do not award the same point twice if it is repeated in different words, e.g. two answers that both say circuits/components are on or off.

Award up to two marks for a linked explanation such as:

• The programmer can control/manipulate the hardware directly (1) because low-level instructions can access registers/memory addresses/hardware features (1)
• The code can be made to work efficiently with a specific device (1) because low-level languages are processor/chipset specific, so the instructions match that hardware (1)
• The code produced is fast to execute (1) because it is optimised for the specific processor/uses few instructions (1)
• The code produced is small (1) so it fits in the limited memory/ROM available in the device (1)

For both marks, the expansion must follow/associate with the statement.

Fast execution and small code size are typical advantages of low-level languages; award them only where the linked reason relates to the device.

Do not accept 'it is easier to write/learn/understand' or 'it is faster to write' as a point or as the expansion, because low-level languages are not easier for these.

Do not accept 'it is close to the hardware' or 'it works with hardware' without expansion of what that allows the program to do.

Do not accept 'because it is low-level' as the expansion; the answer must say what the language/hardware allows.

Indicative content

Control of the hardware

• Low-level languages can read and write the contents of registers and memory addresses directly, so the firmware can take the values from the distance sensors without calling a library routine.
• Assembly language instructions can read from and write to specific input/output ports on the vacuum cleaner's processor, so the motors can be switched on and off directly.
• The programmer decides exactly which processor operations are carried out and in which order, which matters when the vacuum must reverse away from a step or an obstacle.
• A low-level language puts nothing between the program and the hardware, so the programmer can control the hardware of the vacuum cleaner precisely.

Efficiency of the code

• Assembly language code can be hand-optimised instruction by instruction, so the code that checks a sensor is as short as possible.
• The programmer can choose which registers hold values that are used again and again, which cuts down the number of memory accesses the firmware needs.
• A hand-written low-level program can be made compact, so it is more likely to fit in the small amount of memory the vacuum cleaner has.
• Because each instruction does one defined job, the time taken to react to a sensor reading is predictable, which suits firmware that must not overrun.

Link between the language and the processor

• Low-level languages are processor-specific, so the instructions used are those of the exact processor in the vacuum cleaner rather than general statements that need translating.
• Each assembly language instruction maps to one machine code instruction, so the programmer knows precisely which processor operation will be carried out by each line of code.
• An assembler turns each mnemonic into its machine code equivalent, so the machine code running on the vacuum cleaner's processor is exactly what the programmer wrote.
• Code written for a different processor would have to be rewritten, which is acceptable here because the vacuum cleaner always uses the same processor.

Levels

• Level 0 (0 marks): No rewardable content.
• Level 1 (1–2 marks): Basic, independent points are made, showing elements of understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion will contain basic information with little linkage between points made or application to the context. (AO2)
• Level 2 (3–4 marks): Demonstrates adequate understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion shows some linkages and lines of reasoning with some structure and application to the context. (AO2)
• Level 3 (5–6 marks): Demonstrates comprehensive understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science to support the discussion being presented. (AO1) The discussion is well developed, with sustained lines of reasoning that are coherent and logically structured, and which clearly apply to the context. (AO2)

Within Level 1, award 1 mark for a single basic point and 2 marks for two or more independent basic points; Level 2 requires the points to be linked to the vacuum cleaner; Level 3 requires both control of the hardware and efficiency of the code, and a few concise, linked sentences can reach Level 3, so extra length is not required.

Accept registers, memory addresses, input/output ports, machine code and mnemonics as ways of describing access to the hardware, and accept 'a low-level language is faster' as a basic point on its own. Do not award 'binary is a low-level language' (machine code is written in binary, but binary is not a language), or characteristics of high-level languages such as being easy to read or portable, as characteristics of a low-level language.