Menu

Edexcel GCSE Computer Science (1CP2) Exam Questions

Build a practice paper from 597 exam-style questions, each with its mark scheme and example answers. Print it, or answer it on paper and then open the mark schemes. Or browse the questions by topic.

Build a paper

Topics (none ticked: all of them)
Question types (none ticked: all of them)

Practice paper

4 questions · 11 marks

Pick again
Print
1Multiple choice1 markSound Swap Remove

A sound wave is sampled and the amplitude of each sample is stored using 2 bits.

Identify the number of different amplitude values that can be stored for each sample.

[1 mark]
  • A2
  • B4
  • C8
  • D16
Mark scheme
  • B 4 (1)
  • The only correct answer is B. The correct answer is 4 (2 bits give 2^2 = 4 values).
  • A is not correct because 2 is the number of bits used to store each sample
  • C is not correct because 8 different amplitude values would need 3 bits
  • D is not correct because 16 different amplitude values would need 4 bits
Example answers and how they were marked
Full marks1/1

B 4

Why: Selects the only correct option (1).

No marks0/1

C 8

Why: Near miss: 8 values would need 3 bits, one more than this recording uses (0).

No marks0/1

A 2

Why: Typical misconception: 2 is the number of bits, not the number of amplitude values those bits can store (0).

2Short recall2 marksUnits & Conversion Swap Remove

A solid state drive has a capacity of 5 gibibytes.

Give an expression to calculate the number of bits in 5 gibibytes. You do not need to do the calculation.

[2 marks]
Mark scheme

Award one mark for each of:

  • 5 × 1024^3 / 5 × 1024 × 1024 × 1024 / 5 × 2^30, for the number of bytes (1)
  • A fully correct expression with × 8 to convert bytes to bits, in any order, e.g. 5 × 1024^3 × 8, 8 × 5 × 2^30 (1)

Accept 5 × 1 073 741 824 × 8.

Accept 5 × 2^33 or 42 949 672 960 as a fully correct expression (2 marks).

Do not accept 5 × 1000^3 × 8, which uses decimal multiples.

Do not accept ÷ 8, which converts bits to bytes.

Example answers and how they were marked
Full marks2/2

8 × 5 × 2^30

Why: 5 × 2^30 is the number of bytes (1) and × 8 converts bytes to bits (1).

Some marks1/2

5 × 2^30

Why: Correct number of bytes using the binary multiple 2^30 (1), but no conversion to bits.

No marks0/2

5 × 1000^3 × 8

Why: Uses decimal 1000^3 instead of binary 1024^3, so the expression is not fully correct; no creditworthy point.

3Explain2 marksProtocols & Layers Swap Remove

A bank's website can use HTTP or HTTPS.

Explain one benefit to a customer of the bank's website using HTTPS.

[2 marks]
Mark scheme

Award up to two marks for a linked explanation such as:

  • Data is encrypted/scrambled (1) so it cannot be read/understood if it is intercepted (1)
  • The customer's bank/personal details are kept secure/private (1) because the data is encrypted/scrambled during transmission (1)
  • The customer's login details/password cannot be read by an eavesdropper (1) because HTTPS encrypts/scrambles the data sent to and from the web server (1)

For both marks, the expansion must follow/associate with the statement.

Allow 'scrambled' as an alternative to 'encrypted'.

Do not accept 'it is more secure/safe' or 'the data is secure' on its own, without saying how it is made secure (e.g. encryption/scrambling).

Do not accept faster loading/speed, or claims that HTTPS stops viruses or always proves the website is genuine.

Example answers and how they were marked
Full marks2/2

The data is encrypted (1) so anyone intercepting it cannot read the customer's bank details (1).

Why: Linked point (1) and reason (1): encryption means intercepted data cannot be read.

Some marks1/2

The data is encrypted (1) so the website is secure.

Why: Point (1) for encryption, but 'secure' on its own is a near-miss that the mark scheme does not credit as the linked reason; it must say why, e.g. that intercepted data cannot be read.

No marks0/2

HTTPS is faster than HTTP (0) so the customer can log in more quickly.

Why: Speed is not a benefit of HTTPS and is named in a 'Do not accept' line, so no creditworthy point is given.

4Discuss6 marksTranslators Swap Remove

A student is writing a program in a high-level language. The student runs the program after every small change to check that it works.

Discuss whether the student should use an interpreter or a compiler while writing and testing the program.

Your answer should include:

  • how each translator deals with a syntax error
  • how much of the program is translated at a time
  • how this affects the student's testing.
[6 marks]
Mark scheme

Indicative content

How each translator deals with a syntax error

  • An interpreter stops as soon as it finds a syntax error and displays an error message.
  • With an interpreter, the lines before the error have already been executed, so the student can see how far the program got before it stopped.
  • A compiler reports errors at the end of translation, so the student gets a list of all the syntax errors in the program in one go.

How much of the program is translated at a time

  • An interpreter translates one line at a time and executes each line immediately.
  • A compiler translates the whole program in one go before any of it is run.
  • A compiler produces object code, so after every change the whole program must be compiled again before the student can run it.
  • An interpreter produces no object code, so the student does not have to wait for the whole program to be translated before it runs.

How this affects the student's testing

  • An interpreter suits this student because the program can be run straight away after each small change.
  • The interpreter stops at the first error found, so the student fixes that error and runs the program again, but may only find the next error on the next run.
  • Reporting every error at the end of compilation means the student can fix several errors at once, but cannot run the program until the whole program compiles.
  • The student should use an interpreter while testing, and compile the finished program once it works.

Levels

  • Level 0 (0 marks): No rewardable content.
  • Level 1 (1–2 marks): Basic, independent points are made, showing elements of understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion will contain basic information with little linkage between points made or application to the context. (AO2)
  • Level 2 (3–4 marks): Demonstrates adequate understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science. (AO1) The discussion shows some linkages and lines of reasoning with some structure and application to the context. (AO2)
  • Level 3 (5–6 marks): Demonstrates comprehensive understanding of key concepts/principles of computer science to support the discussion being presented. (AO1) The discussion is well developed, with sustained lines of reasoning that are coherent and logically structured, and which clearly apply to the context. (AO2)

Level 3 responses must relate the way each translator works to the student's testing, not just describe the two translators.

Do not accept answers about run-time or logic errors where no comparison of the translators is made.

Example answers and how they were marked
Full marks6/6

The student should use an interpreter while testing. An interpreter translates one line at a time and executes each line straight away, so as soon as the student has made a small change the program can be run without waiting for the whole program to be translated. If there is a syntax error, the interpreter stops at that line and displays an error message, and the lines before it have already been executed, so the student knows exactly where the problem is. A compiler translates the whole program in one go and only reports the errors at the end, so the student would get a list of all the syntax errors, but could not run any of the program until the whole program compiled successfully.

Why: Explains how each translator deals with a syntax error, how much is translated at a time (one line executed immediately against the whole program at once) and links both to the student's testing, with a conclusion. Level 3.

Some marks4/6

An interpreter translates one line at a time and stops when it finds an error, so the student can see where the error is. A compiler translates the whole program and reports all the errors at the end. The interpreter is better for testing because the student can run the program straight away after a change.

Why: Adequate: correct points about error reporting and one line at a time, with a recommendation, but the effect on testing is only asserted rather than reasoned through, so the linkage is not sustained. Level 2.

Some marks1/6

The student should use a compiler because it translates the program one line at a time and stops at the first error, which makes testing quicker.

Why: The roles of the two translators are reversed, so the answer only makes a basic point about testing more quickly. Level 1.

Questions by topic

More ways to revise Edexcel GCSE Computer Science (1CP2)

Teachers: build a paper, print it with the mark schemes at the end, and sign your school up to set your classes activities on every topic.

Fetch Decode Explain isn't affiliated with or endorsed by Pearson Edexcel.