Menu

Topologies

Choosing and Comparing Topologies

A topology recommendation needs two parts: name star or mesh, then justify it by linking its features to the needs of that network. Saying “mesh is better” is not a justification; saying “mesh gives multiple routes, so one broken link does not disconnect the devices” links the feature to reliability.

Comparing the two

FeatureStarMesh
CablingEach wired device has its own cable to the central switch.A wired mesh connects many pairs of devices, so it uses far more cable.
CostFewer cables than an all-connected wired mesh, but the switch costs money.Wired cabling can be expensive; a wireless mesh can avoid some cable costs.
ReliabilityThe central switch is a single point of failure.Multiple routes make it generally more reliable.
FaultsA failed device or its cable affects only that device.Faults can be harder to find, though other routes keep data moving.
ExpansionAdd a device with one new connection.Add a device by linking it to one or more existing devices.
Typical settingA business local area network with a switch at the centre.Where reliability, redundancy or avoiding long cable runs matter.

Making a recommendation

For example, a new escape room venue has four game rooms, each holding a control computer, plus one switch in the staff area. Star is the better choice: the layout is simple, each room is wired separately to the switch, which is less cabling than an all-connected wired mesh linking every room to every other room, and adding a fifth room later means one new connection. If the cable to one room is damaged, the other three games keep running, so the fault is contained. The switch is still a single point of failure, so keeping a spare is sensible. A wireless mesh might suit a temporary outdoor cinema spread across a field, where multiple routes improve reliability and long cable runs are avoided.

Do not claim that either topology is automatically faster: performance depends on the transmission media and other network factors.

Practise this